A coalition of organizations including the American Civil Liberties Union, Human Rights Watch and Drug Policy Alliance is urging congressional Democratic leaders to delay a planned vote on a marijuana banking bill next week until more far-reaching legislation ending federal cannabis prohibition advances first.
â€śWe are concerned that if the House approves this bill, it will undermine broader and more inclusive efforts to reform our countryâ€™s marijuana laws,â€ť the groups wrote to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) in a letter on Tuesday.
Hoyerâ€™s office confirmed to Marijuana Moment last week that the House planned to vote on the cannabis financial services legislation by the end of the month.
â€śThe Congress has a unique opportunity to address the myriad injustices created by this nationâ€™s marijuana laws. For decades, people of color have suffered under harsh and racially-biased marijuana laws,â€ť the groups, which also include Center for American Progress, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and JustLeadershipUSA, wrote. â€śThe banking bill does not address marijuana reform holistically. Instead, it narrowly addresses the issues of banking and improved access to financial services, measures that would benefit the marijuana industry, not communities who have felt the brunt of prohibition.â€ť
The letter is the most public sign yet of a dispute that has been brewing among advocates in the marijuana policy reform movement, with some seeing a successful vote on banking legislation as demonstrating momentum for broader reform and others expressing concern that the financial services proposal primarily helps the industry and could take the wind out of the sails of a full-scale push to end prohibition.
Advocates who want broader reform have focused on a bill that House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) filed this summer that would remove cannabis from the Controlled Substances Act and invest money into programs aimed at repairing the harms of the war on drugs, which has been waged in a racially disproportionate manner.
â€śIndividuals and communities who are still suffering from the destabilizing collateral consequences of prohibition need reform and should not be second in line behind the industry,â€ť Queen Adesuyi, policy coordinator for Drug Policy Alliance, told Marijuana Moment. â€śWe need to ensure that the sequencing of federal marijuana bills, especially under House Democratic Leadership, is well thought out and done in a way that centers the millions directly impacted by overenforcement. We want to avoid the banking bill becoming Congressâ€™ only bite at the apple for cannabis reform this session.â€ť
Nadlerâ€™s bill, the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act, has been referred by House leadership to eight committees, none of whichâ€”including his ownâ€”have scheduled a vote on it. The financial services legislationâ€”the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Actâ€”cleared a committee with a bipartisan vote in March and has been waiting on the House calendar for floor action for months.
â€śItâ€™s a difference in tactics, not desired outcomes,â€ť NORML Political Director Justin Strekal, who supports going forward with the banking vote next week, told Marijuana Moment. â€śItâ€™s our hope that the SAFE Banking vote demonstrates which members of Congress are willing to recognize the successes of state level reforms as we continue to move the MORE Act through the committee process.â€ť
Morgan Fox, media relations director for the National Cannabis Industry Association, took a similar view.
â€śThe SAFE Banking Act is a necessary reform that would represent a major step toward more sensible cannabis laws, and itâ€™s looking increasingly likely that it can actually pass soon,â€ť he said. â€śWe have an opportunity to end policies that actively endanger people, hurt small businesses, and stymie equitable participation in the cannabis industry. Banking reform is certainly not the end of the road, and the industry is committed to working in support of far more comprehensive reforms that more fully address the harms caused by prohibition. Passage of this legislation will only add momentum to those efforts.â€ť
But the groups signing the new letter disagree.
â€śMarijuana legislation must first address the equity and criminal justice reform consequences of prohibition,â€ť they wrote to Pelosi and Hoyer.
â€śTo be clear, we recognize the challenges facing marijuana businesses that lack access to financial services. However, we believe it is a mistake to move this issue forward while many of the other consequences of marijuana prohibition remain unresolved,â€ť they wrote in urging the House not to vote on cannabis financial services legislation next week. â€śThe banking bill does not solve the underlying problems of marijuana prohibition â€“ namely, that many people of color have been saddled with criminal records for a substance that is now legal in many states, and that communities have been shut out of the emerging and booming marijuana industry.â€ť
Meanwhile, on the other side of Capitol, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-ID) said last week that he plans a vote on the marijuana banking bill in his panel by the end of the year. That chamberâ€™s version of the legislation got its 33rd senator signed on this week, meaning that it now has the proactive support of a third of the bodyâ€™s membership.
Because House leaders plan to bring the marijuana banking bill to the floor under a procedure known as suspension of the rules, which requires a two-thirds majority to pass, any Democratic votes lost as a result of the groupsâ€™ opposition could jeopardize the legislation. The SAFE Banking Act currently has 207 lawmakers signed on, whereas 290 votes are needed to approve a bill under suspension.
â€śSince the start of the 116th Congress, we have expressed concern to House Leadership, the House Financial Services Committee, and member offices, that if the banking bill moved to the Floor before broader reform, it would jeopardize comprehensive marijuana reform,â€ť the concerned groups wrote in their letter. â€śTherefore, we have pushed for a conversation among advocates, Committee leadership, and House Leadership to formulate a plan for moving marijuana legislation in a way that is comprehensive and does not result in carve-outs for the industry and leave behind impacted communities.â€ť
â€śWe ask that you delay any vote on the banking bill until agreement has been reached around broader marijuana reform,â€ť they said.
Read the full letter urging a delay on the marijuana banking vote below:
This story has been updated to include comment from Drug Policy Alliance and National Cannabis Industry Association.